Pope Francis - Devotion and Obedience

You are here

Pope Francis - Devotion and Obedience

Login or Create an Account

With a UCG.org account you will be able to save items to read and study later!

Sign In | Sign Up

×

I joined millions of others in watching the biggest news story of the year so far unfold: the announcement of Francis I as the new pope. There was plenty of spectacle: impressive displays by the Swiss Guard, marching bands, excited throngs singing in the pope’s honor, and seemingly baffled news anchors barely keeping up with the action.

In all of the ritual and ceremonial dogma, one specific custom caught my eye. After the presentation of Pope Francis I as the new Bishop of Rome, each of the electing cardinals stepped up to the pope and, in turn, vowed to obey him. A vow of obedience is an enormous responsibility to commit yourself to. It means that you, in essence, are living for that person from that time on and acknowledging that their will is the most important thing in your life.

I had one question in mind after watching it all. Where is God in all of this? The focus on the celebration was clearly on a man—the pope—and the ones who selected him. The cardinals referred to Francis I as their “Holy Father.” Jesus specifically said that titles like that are reserved exclusively for God the Father (Matthew 23:9).

So is unquestioning obedience. Why was it a big deal for the cardinals to vow obedience to Pope Francis? Because, as leader of the Catholic Church, the pope takes responsibility for and acts as an official representative of the beliefs of his church. And frankly, some of those beliefs just aren’t biblical, like Sunday worship, Mary reverence and a Friday to Sunday crucifixion timeline.

The apostles faced religious leaders who demanded obedience to themselves instead of God. They had the right perspective. The apostles responded to them, “We must obey God rather than any human authority” (Acts 5:29, New Living Translation). The cardinals made their choice, and they decided they would obey a man. You have the same exact choice to make right now. Will you obey a man? Or will you obey the God who created the universe, the true Holy Father of all?

Comments

  • KARS

    Greetings again Mr. Matthew Boland.
    1. Not anywhere in the New Testament did our Lord Jesus Christ or His Apostles write a creed.
    2. " I am very much in favour of the 10 Commandments (the food laws no longer apply - Mk 7:19), and never claimed that the pope is our biological father." Your "Pope" is still breaking Jesus commandment: Matthew 23: 9 " Do not call anyone on earth your father; for One is your Father, He who is in heaven."
    UCG.org / Bible Study Tools / Booklets / What Does the Bible Teach About Clean and Unclean... / Does the New Testament Abolish Meat Distinctions?

  • dmcf

    1. Not anywhere in the New Testament did our Lord Jesus Christ or His Apostles write the Bible. Nor were they commanded to or even suggested to by our Lord Jesus Christ.

  • KARS

    Greetings Mr. McFeely (I see your using the name of the mailman from Mr. Roger's Neighborhood).
    Do you not remember that the Jews had scribes in New Testament times?

  • KARS

    Greetings Mr. Boland.
    Your answer:
    God our Father and His Only Begotten Son Jesus Christ our Lord.
    Good Day Sir.

  • KARS

    Hi Matthew Boland, Do you realize your arguing against our Savior's teachings? Perhaps you misunderstand what Jesus was saying. Jesus was talking about preachers, those that teach theology with the titles Jesus mentioned in Matthew 23:1-10. Read it in context and see if you can understand. As for honor your father and mother that is part of the 10 Commandments. The Pope is NOT our biological father. As for the authorities that rule our nations, as long as they don't break the 10 Commandments, food laws, etc. We "give Caesar what Caesar is due. " Remember the story of Meshach, Shadrach, & Abednego? They would not break God's 3rd Commandment (Exodus 20:4-5; Deuteronomy 5:8-9) so King Nebuchadnezzar threw them in the fiery furnace.

  • Matt4444

    Hi Kathy,
    Thanks again for your comments.
    As I said in my answer to your previous post, St Paul refers to himself as 'father' and he is a preacher and teaches theology. Are you also claiming that those who teach theology cannot be called 'teacher'? It's a pretty common word for those who do any kind of teaching.
    I am very much in favour of the 10 Commandments (the food laws no longer apply - Mk 7:19), and never claimed that the pope is our biological father. I also remember the story of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, but am not sure how it is relevant.
    Peace to you,
    Matthew

  • KARS

    Hi Mr. Boland.
    They are not my words, they are our Savior's words I posted a pervious post leaving details of Matthew 23:1-10. I believe what our Savior said; and anyone calling themselves this is not a true disciple of Jesus Christ. I see Christ sayings these words as a warning to his people of His church. Because I read the New Testament from cover to cover I know that the preachers under these titles have taken it upon themselves (with their own personnel agenda) to start their own religions by taking away from the truths of the gospel and added their own twists and turns to suit their means. There is much knowledge at this site to help one see were the errors where introduced by these kind of preachers. Some would call them "wolves in sheep's clothing". Just the same, I have read Jesus words in context and I believe what He says.
    Shabbot Shalom,
    Mr. Matthew Boland

  • Matt4444

    Hi Kathy,
    Thanks again for your thoughts.
    I feel that I have responded to the points you raised in your comments, but that you haven't engaged with the points I raised, so perhaps that means our discussion is over.
    I would like to leave you with one thought though. Who is the proper interpreter of Sacred Scripture - Matthew Boland, Kathy Shafer, or the Church which Christ instituted, is carried on through Apostolic Succession, and gave us the Scriptures? I think the answer is clear.
    Peace and blessings to you on your faith journey,
    Matthew

  • KARS

    Hello Mike Boland, I'd like to shed some light for you as well.
    Matthew 23:1-10 These are Jesus Christ our Lord's own words. verse 8 "But you, do not be called Rabbi,; for One is your teacher, the Christ... verse 9 Do not call anyone on earth your father, for One is your Father, He who is in heaven. verse 10 And do not be called teachers; for One is your Teacher, the Christ. Christ here is referring to preacher's.
    Infant baptisms are done by pouring water over their foreheads. Hebrews 6:1-2 verse 2 "of the doctrine of baptisms, of laying on of hands,... Matthew 4:16 When He had been baptized , Jesus came up immediately from the water;... By what authority as you say does the Pope have permission to change water baptism and the laying on of hands? Jesus Christ is our example. There are no instructions in the New Testament about infant baptisms.
    Obedience: Matthew 23:1T hen Jesus spoke to the multitudes and to His disciples, saying: " the scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses seat. " Therefore whatever they tell you to observe, that observe and do, but do not do according to their works: for they say and do not do." When the Ten Commandments are broken we do not obey.

  • Matt4444

    Hi Kathy,
    Thanks for your comments.
    I realise that they are Christ's words, but sometimes his words are not to be taken literally (e.g. Mt 5:29; 7:6; 12:49; Mk 11:23; Lk 12:49). This is not an indictment of Christ, but simply a fact of human communication. I'm sure you've used hyperbole and metaphor before.
    How do you know he is referring to preachers? It sounds like you are interpreting the text. All texts need interpretation; the question is, who has the authority to give the correct interpretation?
    Paul was a preacher (1 Tim 2:7), and, as I mentioned in my post, he referred to himself as 'father'. Is he disobeying Christ?
    The pope hasn't changed the method of baptism; it still includes water and the laying on of hands. Whole households were baptised in the New Testament (1 Cor 1:16), which presumably would've included infants, and there are no instructions about not baptising infants. However, this is not relevant to the original post or my comments on it.
    I'm not sure what the scribes and pharisees have to do with obedience to the Church, but Jesus expected his followers to obey those he put in authority (e.g. Lk 10:16).
    Peace to you,
    Matthew

  • Matt4444

    Milan, I'd like to offer a Catholic perspective on this if I may.

    'Where is God in all of this?' The pope is the successor of St Peter to whom was given the authority to bind and loose (Mt 16:19 - note the singular 'you' in the Greek). God is present insofar as he instituted this hierarchy.

    To say that Jesus forbids one to use the word 'father' is unreasonable. Do you refer to your natural father as 'father'? Are you allowed to call your teachers at school 'teacher' (cf. Mt 23:10)? What about 'our father David' or 'Abraham' (Acts 4:25, 7:2, Rom 4:16), or when Paul refers to himself as 'father' on multiple occasions (Phil 2:22, 1 Thess 2:11, Philemon 1:10, 1 Cor 4:15). Clearly the word 'father' can be used of some human beings.

    Regarding obedience (Acts 5:29), once again you are taking Scripture out of context. Sometimes we must obey 'men'. Children must obey their parents (cf. Eph 6:1), slaves obey their masters (Col 3:22), Paul explicitly requires obedience to his apostolic authority (2 Thess 3:14, Philemon 1:21), and Hebrews exhorts us to obey our 'leaders' (Heb 13:17). What is your evidence that the obedience to the pope is unquestioning?

    Peace to you,
    Matthew

  • emalecki
    As a child, I was raised Catholic. Being impressionable, I wondered, why would anyone lie to me. In my twenties, I thought I was doing right by going to supposed 'non-denominational Bible only' teaching churches. Then I really thought that I was doing the right things. Each of the church buildings I visited all said the same message; "There are those teaching false doctrines that we need to stay away from. We will be deceived." What never caught my attention (at first) was these church preachers were teaching me this on Sundays, Christmas Day, Easter. Thankfully, the Lord put something in me that all of my life, if what I was being told did not seem to make sense, I had to research why it was being taught this way. Example; in the Catholic school I was taught about purgatory, at the same time being told that Jesus paid for my sins. Even as a child I could never reconcile this thinking. If He already paid for my sins, why do I have to pay again later? I have no basis for saying this but my thoughts are, if any of the churches decided all of a sudden to seriously teach from the Bible, in all doctrine, they may lose many people who have conformed to tradition. Losing these people consequently would cost 'tithes and donations'. Many still prefer money over God.
  • Joshua Infantado
    With all these happening, I wonder if the cardinals and the pope himself know the biblical truths from the Bible. Are they really deceived or just willingly ignorant of what the Bible really teaches. I believe it is safe to assume that they really know what the Bible teaches since they had studied it for a very long time. It will be hard to believe that after their years of study, they will still believe that Christ died on a friday and rose on a sunday.
  • Join the conversation!

    Log in or register to post comments