The Quiet Islamic Movement to Restore the Caliphate
A commentary by Jerold Aust
Senior Good News writer, Mobile, Alabama
Bible
prophecy reveals that a significantly influential ruler over the peoples
who occupy territories surrounding the Holy Land, possibly a modern day Muslim
confederation, will in some manner attack a "king of the North"—a
modern version of the ancient Roman emperor (Daniel 11:40).
In the past the greatest Muslim confederations were led by a caliph,
a leader of all Muslims. The word "caliph" is the English
form of the Arabic term kalifa, which means successor. The ruling
institution of the caliphs is called the caliphate.
The original caliphate was created in AD 632 after the death of Islam's
founder, Muhammad; hence the office of "successor" to Muhammad.
If a revived caliphate surfaced today, it could boast of 1.5 billion
Muslims worldwide—providing all Muslims unite under one
leader to circumvent Islamic nationalism and ethnicity.
The present Hizb ut-Tahrir, the Party of Liberation, is working to
restore the caliphate. Started in Jerusalem by an Arab judge in 1953,
this movement teaches Muslims to stop being slaves to men and become
slaves of Allah—peacefully.
"Its activists aim to persuade Muslim political and
military leaders that reestablishing the Caliphate is their Islamic duty" (James
Brandon, The Christian Science Monitor, May 10, 2006). The movement
is a quiet one because many Islamic governments view a caliphate as a
threat to their own power.
Stephen Ulph, a senior fellow at the Jamestown Foundation says, "The
Caliphate is a rallying point between the radicals and the more moderate
Islamists. The idea of a government based on the Caliphate has a historical
pedigree and Islamic legitimacy that Western systems of government by
their very nature do not have" (ibid.).
Understandably, modern Islam shows no outward desire for restoring
the caliphate. It is too involved with the more sectarian-religious form
of Islam as practiced in the individual Islamic nations. Modern media,
in addressing sectarian Muslims today, tend to report on the current
Islamic models as if they have always existed.
However, the modern Islamic models are quite different from the caliphate
system. The caliphate was a more decentralized system which accounted
for its longevity, while variations of modern Islam are, over the past
century, more centrally controlled. History indicates that a decentralized
caliphate would wield greater power over more people than any present
Islamic state.
One of the latest and greatest examples is the Ottoman Caliphate (Empire).
It lasted some 634 years (1290-1924). Another decentralized Caliphate
was the Abbasid Caliphate (750-1258), centered in Baghdad, Iraq. It was
generally peaceful and stable for over 500 years.
During that time, Islamic art flourished, the main elements of Sharia
law were developed and important schools of philosophy and religious
thought were established. It was then that exclusive Arab hold on Islam
was finally broken and all Moslems came to be seen as equals.
Although some modern Muslims strongly desire a revival of a caliphate
not limited by national borders, no one can guarantee it would remain
decentralized. It is possible that a caliph could come into power as
a peaceful leader and then become more regionally militant, which would
fit the description of the aggressive end-time "king of the South" prophesied
in Daniel 11:40.
Of course, there is no ironclad way to determine how the king of the
South will surface. Yet it is clear that over the past 50 years many
Arabic leaders, claiming to act under the banner of Islam, have attempted
to galvanize Muslims under their leadership. Saddam Hussein considered
himself a successor of the ancient Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar. Others
have viewed themselves as great Middle Eastern leaders, including Egypt's
Gamal Abdel Nasser and Libya's Muammar Gadhafi.
It is also a historical fact that the caliphate has fared far better
in keeping Islam united than any other type of Muslim leadership over
the past 1,000 years. It is hard to argue against a caliphate that lasted
500 years. The key to the far-reaching influence of the caliphate lay
in decentralized power, allowing all professing Muslims, irrespective
of race or nationality, to enter the fold.
The modern movement for restoring the caliphate over Islam is presently
growing quietly throughout the Middle East. If it should succeed it could
possibly decentralize control over Muslims from Morocco to Indonesia—at
least 1.5 billion Islamic followers. That would change dramatically the
scope of Islamic power and influence in the world today.
 Of
course, not all possibilities become realities. Yet the roots of major
shifts in power in the past were often visible long before they become
realities. To understand how the prophesied conflict between the king
of the South and the king of the North could affect your life, request,
read online or download our free booklet The Middle East in Bible
Prophecy.
|
