Ussher's Erroneous Interpretation of Genesis

Printer-friendly version


One of several controversies that broke out between the scientific community and the Roman church concerned the age of the earth.

One of several controversies that broke out between the scientific community and the Roman church concerned the age of the earth. The church had taught through the centuries that the earth was only a few thousand years old. The Reformers also shared that view. An English bishop, James Ussher (1581-1656), announced that he had pinpointed the creation of Adam as not only in 4004 B.C., but, to be more precise, at 8 o'clock on Saturday morning, Oct. 22.

None of this, of course, was spelled out in the ScripturesThe divinely inspired writings of both the Old and New Testaments. The term Scripture is used in the New Testament to refer to both the Hebrew Bible (Luke 24:44-45) and the new apostolic writings accepted as inspired (2 Peter 3:16; 1 Timothy 5:18).. To regard the creation of the earth and Adam to be at virtually the same time is erroneous, as we shall see in a future installment.

Consequently, it came as a great surprise in the 19th century when the emerging science of geology began to discover and analyze many deep, fossil-laden strata. In 1799 William Smith, known as the father of English geology, established what was called the geologic column. Two centuries of subsequent geologic work all over the globe have largely vindicated his basic conclusions.

Even today geologists, having drilled as far as seven miles into the earth's crust, can find oil by comparing the rock layers to this geologic column. The same basic pattern has been confirmed by thousands of geologic and oil explorations. The essentials of this geologic column were established before Charles Darwin came onto the scene.

The earliest geologists, many of whom were studious Christians, believed that an ancient earth did not contradict the biblical account. After all, they had seen that the BibleThe books (Greek, "biblia" ) that are acknowledged as canonical (authoritative) by the early Christian Church. It includes both the books of the ancient Hebrew prophets and those of the apostolic witnesses to Jesus Christ. did not give a date for the original creation. Genesis 1 could be seen as an original creation, and later, after an indeterminate period, came the formation in seven days of the present human, animal and plant life as we know it. Up to that time in the Western world, no one had questioned the biblical account of the creation of living things. Evolution was not generally accepted.

Related Content

Hands Holding Jigsaw Puzzle Pieces In Front Of Blue Sky
Posted June 4, 1996
Model of Jerusalem in the Late Second Temple Period - Archaeology and the City o
Posted July 16, 1996

Nobody has commented yet. Be the first to kick off the discussion!

Login/Register to post comments

Related Booklet

Is the Bible True?

Is the Bible True?

The BibleThe books (Greek, "biblia" ) that are acknowledged as canonical (authoritative) by the early Christian Church. It includes both the books of the ancient Hebrew prophets and those of the apostolic witnesses to Jesus Christ. is much quoted, but little understood or believed. Can the BibleThe books (Greek, "biblia" ) that are acknowledged as canonical (authoritative) by the early Christian Church. It includes both the books of the ancient Hebrew prophets and those of the apostolic witnesses to Jesus Christ. withstand scrutiny of its apparent contradictions? Should you believe it?

Tagged with...

Connect with Good News

© 1995-2012 United Church of God, an International Association | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. All correspondence and questions should be sent to info@ucg.org. Send inquiries regarding the operation of this Web site to webmaster@ucg.org.



X
You may login with either your assigned username or your e-mail address.
The password field is case sensitive.
Loading