When does a human life begin?: What is the breath of life?

You are here

When does a human life begin?

What is the breath of life?

Login or Create an Account

With a UCG.org account you will be able to save items to read and study later!

Sign In | Sign Up

×

According to the Bible and biology, a human being comes into existence at conception. From this point onward, there is no question as to what this life will become should it continue to grow and develop. It will not be a cat or a bird or a fish. It is clearly human.

Several scriptures confirm that God considered babies in the womb to be people with whom He was already working (see Jeremiah 1:5 and Job 31:15) and beings capable of reacting to things happening outside their mother's wombs (Luke 1:41, 44).

The belief that a human being doesn't become a human being until he or she breathes on his or her own outside the womb is sometimes derived from Genesis 2:7, which says: "And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being."

Yet, while this is the way Adam (and apparently Eve) came into existence, it is not the way the rest of us have come to have life. We came into existence through conception and being carried in our mother's wombs—not being shaped first as full-grown adults and then having life breathed into us.

The Bible explains that life is in the blood (Leviticus 17:14). Within four or five weeks of conception babies already have their own blood system. In the womb, via the mother's blood, a baby receives nutrients and oxygen—thus receiving "the breath of life" prior to being born. A baby in the womb has blood circulating through its body and is "breathing" by loose analogy like a fish breathes in the water. As a fish gathers the oxygen from the water, so, too, the baby draws oxygen from its mother's blood.

The book Principles of Anatomy and Physiology (Tortora and Anagnostakos, fifth ed., pp. 750-751) states about this process: "They [chorionic villi, microscopic fingerlike projections that make up the placenta] continue growing until they are bathed in maternal blood sinuses called intervillous spaces. Thus, maternal and fetal blood vessels are brought into proximity.

"It should be noted however, that maternal and fetal blood do not normally mix. Oxygen and nutrients from the mother's blood diffuse into the capillaries of the villi. From the capillaries the nutrients circulate into the umbilical vein. Wastes leave the fetus through the umbilical arteries, pass into the capillaries of the villi, and diffuse into the maternal blood" (emphasis added).

The blood of the mother and the baby don't mix. The baby has its own blood and is equipped to receive the oxygen and nutrients and dispose of waste materials via its mother. Its heart is beating, circulating its own oxygenated and deoxygenated blood through its body. It is even conscious at times—looking around, kicking its feet and sucking its thumb (quite unlike the initial creation process of Adam or Eve).

These are a few of the reasons we believe babies in the womb are "living souls," and thus, why it is murder to abort them.

Comments

  • United Church of God
    Dear rettsgem, When Adam was created, he was a full-sized human being. He needed only to take his first breath to be alive. When babies are created their lives begin in the mother’s womb. The Bible indicates that God believes a fetus in the womb is a human being. He said of Jeremiah, “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you; before you were born I sanctified you; I ordained you a prophet to the nations” (Jeremiah 1:5). So, God knew much about Jeremiah even before he was born. The dead will be resurrected (see Ezekiel 37). Some may have severe health problems. The Bible says God will heal them (Isaiah 35:5); that will likely include your friend’s aborted child. You also asked what my counsel would be to a mother who is considering abortion because, if kept to term, the baby might be horribly deformed. I know this is an extremely difficult and heart-wrenching decision. So, my advice to the mother would be to put the outcome in the hands of God. She, with friends, should go to God in earnest, fervent prayer and fasting, asking Him to be the judge of what happens. God may allow a natural abortion, He may allow the baby to be born with certain deformities, or He may choose to heal the deformed fetus or the baby after birth. In the Bible, there are many examples of miraculous and marvelous healings by God, and who knows if He may add another one in such a situation? It is far better to put such circumstances as this into the hands of God than to take matters into our own hands. When we “in everything by prayer and supplication...let [our] requests be made known to God,” we will have “the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding” (Philippians 4:6-7). In going to God for such decisions, all involved will be much more likely to at least have peace of mind.
  • rettsgem
    A sister in Christ sent me this article in January. My ex-sister-in-law, not converted was told her unborn child was not viable early in her pregnancy. Test results showed that her child was horribly deformed and would be totally mentally and physically challenged if taken to term. She and my brother, a doctor, elected to have her pregnancy terminated based on her doctor's test results. To my knowledge, the child was alive but in serious trouble. How would you councel a mother under these circumstances?
  • Ken Murray

    Yes, this is an excellent Vertical Thought article, regarding the resurrection to life for innocent aborted children and even stillborn children from this age of man.

    I really like Nathan Albright's comments above, too.

    Even the chronology of Jacob's family, if you look at it closely, shows that one of the wives in the family went into Egypt pregnant yet the then-unborn child was considered one of those who went down into Egypt.

    Likewise John the Baptist had the Holy Spirit from his mother's womb (the Greek normally would suggest "from" (the time after) the womb, but Gabriel spoke in a Semitic language to the high priest and that would imply "beginning with" the time in the womb).

    He also recognized the voice of Jesus' mother and with spiritual significance. So he had the spirit of man forming in him, and also the Spirit of God joined with the spirit of man.

    Jesus Christ naturally was begotten of the Father in a special way in Mary's womb and without question He was what He was from the moment of conception, a real flesh and blood human being.

    The implication is that every human being who has ever been aborted is a human being and worthy of resurrection in the day of judgment.

    Why should an aborted child, in this life, never have the right to the human life it deserved to have, simply because of the murderous sins of its parents?

    It could very likely be the case that those same aborted innocent children will be handed to their parents in the 2nd Resurrection. Those parents then, will be expected to raise those children lovingly and responsibly with a commitment to teaching them God's way of life, so they can ultimately be transformed as sons and daughters of God, too.

    The Earth just might become the largest day care centre one could imagine. :)

  • nathanalbright

    I conclude that the innocent victims of abortion will live again in the judgment to come based on an implication from scripture. First, we see in Jeremiah 1:4-5 that God is able to know character in the womb. We also see from Genesis 25:23-28 and Malachi 1 that God's choice of those whom He calls can also sometimes occur in the womb before someone has drawn their first breath. This is a clear implication that God considers them alive. Additionally, both the law and prophets strongly condemn both abortion and even negligent homicide of unborn children. Amos 1:13-15 pronounces judgment on Ammon for their abortions to limit the population of Israel in Gilead. Also, Exodus 21:22-25 provides the full protection of Israelite lex talionis for the unborn in the case of negligent homocide, a far lower standard than the premeditated murder of the unborn as abortion is. This law and prophecy would seem to suggest as well that God views the killing of the unborn as murder, meaning He recognizes the unborn as living human beings subject to the full protection of His law. Finally, by implication from Isaiah 65:20, unborn children could be seen as children living (in the womb) for but a few days, who will live again in the Great White Throne Judgment to come. Therefore, by implication (if not direct statement), given the fact that the unborn are given the full legal protection as human beings and are called by God, and that those children whose lives on this earth were short will live again in the Great White Throne Judgment, it is a reasonable inference to conclude that the innocent victims of abortion will also live again in that time as well.

  • Join the conversation!

    Log in or register to post comments