I agree Jen. The statement made was: "tongues” was not something everyone needed to do in order to prove that you have the Holy Spirit of God. Darris said that, Acts 2:3 "there appeared a “Cloven” tongue like “Fire” that sat on each of them." It seems it is important to “speak in tongues” which was the “sign” that they received the “Holy Ghost.” They spoke with two different types of tongues one sounded like “Fire” the other was a specific ethnic language that others could interpret. He said, when this incident happened “the windows were open to the mild spring air in Jerusalem . . . suddenly, hair, clothing and objects on tables began flying, and interrupted the gathering . . . ." This is a complete “fabrication of the King James." I am a living witness. I received the Holy Spirit at age eleven, I spoke in tongues, no one laid hands on me, I was not baptized before I received the Holy Spirit but, I got baptized later so there was no “process.” Darris ask “Is speaking in tongues proof one has received the indwelling of the Holy Spirit of God? Gary said, No. “Speaking in tongues is a gift God gives ‘when He deems appropriate. Not true. What about Azusa street? God gave this gift.