Who Was "Saint Patrick"? Should a Christian Observe Saint Patrick's Day?

You are here

Who Was "Saint Patrick"? Should a Christian Observe Saint Patrick's Day?

Login or Create an Account

With a UCG.org account you will be able to save items to read and study later!

Sign In | Sign Up

×

Let's start with what most people think they know. We have been told that Patrick was a Catholic monk who brought the Trinity doctrine to the people of Ireland. And along the way he drove all the snakes from the Emerald Isle. He became so renowned that the Catholic Church made him a "saint." None of that is true!

Patrick was Scottish!

Patrick's given name was actually Maewyn Succat (or Sucat). He took the name Patrick most likely because of the area he was from in Scotland. That's right, Patrick was Scottish, not Irish! Here's what Patrick said himself of his background: " I, Patrick…had Calpornius  for my father, a deacon, a son of the late Potitus, the presbyter, who dwelt in the village of Banavan…I was captured. I was almost sixteen years of age…and taken to Ireland in captivity with many thousand men" (William Cathcart, D. D., The Ancient British and Irish Churches , p.127).

Patrick labored for six years as a slave until he managed to escape back to his native Scotland around A.D. 376. He believed he had a calling from God, however, to go back to Ireland to teach God's Word to the people there. The Catholic Church, while having had an impact in England and later Scotland, did not have a significant foothold in Ireland until the 12th century. They didn't even acknowledge Patrick for about 200 years after his death.  Patrick was connected to what is known as the Celtic Church. It was very much opposed to what was taught in the Roman Catholic Church.

Patrick did not follow Roman Catholic doctrine

While we have little of Patrick's history and teaching written by himself, what's taught about Patrick now didn't surface until about 500 years after his death. It was the Catholic priest Jocelyn, writing around A.D. 1130 who wrote most extensively about Patrick. He ignored much of what was known then about Patrick and inserted a Catholic background into Patrick's story. Patrick never wrote about a connection to Rome or popes or that his authority came from there. So if Patrick wasn't Roman Catholic, what did he teach?

In A.D. 596 Pope Gregory sent a group of monks to England to try and bring the Celtic Church under the authority of Rome. However, the Celts refused to acknowledge Gregory's authority and rejected the teachings of the Roman Church. In Ireland the monks found that the Celtic Church permitted their priests to marry. They also practiced baptism by full immersion in water. The Celtic Church also rejected the doctrine of (papal) infallibility and veneration, transubstantiation, the confessional, the Mass, relic worship, image adoration and the primacy of Peter (Truth Triumphant , by B.G. Wilkinson, pg. 108). The latter list is of specific Roman Catholic doctrines that the Celtic Church knew were not taught in the Scriptures.

Patrick observed the Saturday Sabbath, Passover and rejected the Trinity doctrine

Patrick also rejected the merging of church and state (a main teaching of Catholicism). He believed and taught the same as Jesus in John:18:36 that God's Kingdom is not of this world. The Celtic Church had local ecclesiastical councils and kept Saturday as a day of rest, (A.C. Flick, The Rise of Medieval Church, pp. 236-327). In this matter of a Saturday (Sabbath) rest, Dr. James C. Moffatt wrote that, "They [the Celtic churches] obeyed the fourth commandment [the Sabbath commandment] literally upon the seventh day of the week" (The Church in Scotland , pg. 140).

Patrick (and the Celtic Church) observed the other "festivals of the Eternal" (Leviticus 23), believed human beings were mortal (that is rejected the teaching of an immortal soul and the doctrine of going to heaven or hell), rejected the Trinity doctrine, followed the food laws of Leviticus 11, refused veneration of "saints" or worship of Mary, and believed that only Jesus Christ is our mediator (Leslie Hardinge, The Celtic Church in Britain ; B.G. Wilkinson, Truth Triumphant ).

The Celtic Church had a long history before the Catholic Church pushed deeper into England, Scotland and Ireland. Celtic writings speak of individuals coming from Asia Minor who brought with them the doctrines they received from John, Paul, Philip and other apostles of Jesus. A Catholic "father," Bede, (who lived in the mid 700s A.D.) who wrote about the Celtic Church: "They ignorantly refuse to observe our Easter [Pascha, or Passover] on which Christ was sacrificed, arguing that it should be observed with the Hebrew Passover on the fourteenth of the moon" (Bede, Historia Ecclesiastica ).

Is Saint Patrick's Day in the Bible?

Saint Patrick's Day is not a biblical holiday or Holy Day. And, as it is currently celebrated, St. Patrick's Day actually has nothing to do with the historical man Patrick. Many "Christian" holidays are a mixture of truth and error. Because of this, most people don't really know the history or purpose of the day. We encourage you to read what God said in the Bible to know which Holy Days He made and who He said are saints. The United Church of God traces its origins to the Church that Jesus founded in the early first century. We follow the same teachings, doctrines and practices established then, and believe our commission is to proclaim the gospel of the coming Kingdom of God to all the world as a witness and teach all nations to observe what Christ commanded.

It appears that Patrick believed these same teachings. We encourage you to read the online Bible study aids, Fundamental Beliefs of the United Church of God and The Church Jesus Built to learn more about what individuals like Patrick taught and what we teach from Scripture. From our best historical understanding, the Patrick you didn't know lived a life according to the Bible, rather than human traditions. You can too.

Comments

  • asco

    Yes, this is all correct!

  • david from tx

    Ironically, it appears that Patrick actually was a saint. It also appears as if the Celtic Church was the Church during that time.

  • Skip Miller

    Hello Mark,
    I was ready to state that you asked too many questions all at once but
    Lena has answered so completely that I don't really need to say this.
    If you believe in the Trinity strongly (and you have already read our booklets on it)
    then everything else you wonder about is secondary (almost beside the point!)
    The trinity is the number one pagan concept believed by many professing Christians.
    When you realize that God is 2 Beings not three and the Holy Spirit is the very essence
    of those two Beings which essence can be given to humans (us!) then we can communicate.

  • Bugchaser56

    What I find interesting and troubling is what he and the Celtic church did not believe.. If he didn't believe in the Trinity is enough to not accept him as a true teacher. One cannot deny the Holy Trinity. The one evidence that proves the Holy Trinity is when Jesus is being baptized by John the Baptist. First, God the Son was in the water with John, God the Father (the only true Holy Father) spoke of His beloved Son when He came out of the water, and the Holy Spirit was descending down to Jesus. Additionally, when just before Christ was taken up into Heaven to take His throne next the Father, He told His disciples to go into all of the world and make disciples of all men, baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. In Genesis, when God was making man, He said let US make man in OUR own image. To whom would God be speaking of? Certainly wasn't the angels. The Trinity alone would be enough to reject Patrick as a true believer. Other teachings such as rejecting the immortality of man's soul, the unbelief of Heaven and Hell would just be more evidence to prove he was in error. The good thing is that he wasn't truly roman catholic. That is a plus.

  • Lena VanAusdle

    Hi Mark,
    If there is really a trinity, why didn't Paul ever mention the HS in his greetings to the brethren (Rom. 1:7; 1 Cor. 1:3; 2 Cor. 1:2; Gal. 1:3; etc.)? In John 1:1-3 it is says that God the Father and the Word (Jesus Christ) were together (in whose image we are made), there is no mention of the Holy Spirit. Why? Because the Holy Spirit is the power of God that works with us, not a being.
    The only thing the Bible teaches us about the soul, is that it dies (Ezek. 18:4, 20).
    The fate of the wicked isn't hell, but eternal death (Malachi 4:3).
    The fate of the righteous is the Kingdom of God (which will be on earth) (Rev. 5:10; 20:4, 6)
    Is God a Trinity? https://www.ucg.org/bible-study-tools/booklets/is-god-a-trinity
    Heaven & Hell: What Does the Bible Really Teach? https://www.ucg.org/bible-study-tools/booklets/heaven-and-hell-what-does-the-bible-really-teach

  • derrickrose73@gmail.com

    Thank you Lena!!! You nailed it! But only God can open the eyes of the willing. If you are honest, and you ask Him truthfully, and humbly, he will open your eyes, so you can see. Remember also Matthew 10:28. That same 'soul' will be DESTROYED (fully perished) in Gehenna (the burning garbage dump - figurative, but 'literal' lake of fire), as you have so clearly noted!!

  • Brian1776

    *That’s right, Patrick was Scottish, not Irish!* It is an interesting and true fact that the Scots invaded northern Britain from Ireland in the Dark Ages, while the AngloSaxons and Jutes invaded southern Britain. Scots spoke the Gaelic form of Celtic; while the Celts of Britain spoke Brythonic Celtic. Welsh, Bretton and Cornish remain of the Brythonic languages.

  • RonLKuykendall

    I had read an article from a Bible school in Scotland where they stated that St. Patrick never adhered to the authority and teachings of the Roman Catholic church but only adhered to and taught the Scriptures. But your article here is the best I've ever read about St. Patrick. Thank you.

  • Copslb
    Article point that he kept Easter and Christmas... he would not be following what was taught in the Bible if he kept the pagan days...
  • vincent1
    Terrific article, interesting just how ideas, history etc are changed from what actually happened or who a person really was, taught or believed into something totally different. Great to read about actual history when ever possible.
  • jwbsr40
    I am glad that this day is finally clarified. For years I thought it was a holy day! Thank you. John Bauer
  • Join the conversation!

    Log in or register to post comments