United Church of God, an International Association
Council of Elders Quarterly Meeting Report
Milford, Ohio
Monday, December 4, 2017
Chairman Don Ward called the morning session to order at 9:00 a.m. Eastern, and the meeting was opened with prayer. Eleven Council of Elders (Council) members were present. Scott Ashley joined about 90 minutes later each day because he was teaching an ABC class. Mario Seiglie taught for the next 90 minutes after Mr. Ashley each day.
Chairman Ward welcomed everyone and mentioned the importance of discerning the times we are living in. We are not living in normal times. The Church is called to take the gospel to the world and to prepare a people for the return of Jesus Christ. We are here because we love the truth of God. We need to work as dedicated men seeking God’s will working in a spirit of unity and speaking what needs to be said. Open honest discussions are always needed for there to be true peace and unity, which also includes listening to what others have to say so we can continue to move forward.
The last Council meeting minutes were approved. The agenda for the week was approved.
President’s Report—Victor Kubik [video done]
President Victor Kubik greeted everyone. He expressed gratitude to God for the work He has allowed to be done, for the revelations He gives us, and for His will revealed to us.
Mr. Kubik commented on some of the following major activities:
Operation Manager Reports:
Media and Communications Services—Peter Eddington [video done]
Peter Eddington went through some of the following statistics as of Nov. 30 this year:
Some other items Mr. Eddington reported were:
Ministerial and Member Services (MMS)—Chris Rowland [video done]
Chris Rowland, administrator of MMS, summarized some manpower changes since the last meetings in August:
Current statistics include:
Treasurer and Financial Services Report—Rick Shabi [video done]
Rick Shabi updated the Council on the financial activities of the Church since the August Council meetings.
The annual audit report has been issued by the independent accounting firm, Clark Schafer and Hackett. Two letters that accompany the audit were discussed with the Council. The first letter addressed internal controls and any adjustments to the accounting records that were required as a result of the audit. The audit firm found no deficiencies in internal control, and no adjustments were required.
The second letter offered an “unqualified” opinion on our financial statements, meaning that as a result of the review, the auditors’ opinion is that our financial reports, both monthly and annual, present fairly the financial position of the Church.
The complete audited financial statements and auditor’s report will be printed in the next issue of United News, and Mr. Shabi commented that the partner from our audit firm will be at the Council meetings later that day to make a presentation and answer any further questions.
Mr. Shabi then discussed various financial statements of the Church for this fiscal year, which began July 1. He noted that overall the financial position of the Church continues to be very strong. The year-to-date balance sheet, income statement and operating statistics were then discussed in some detail, with the following highlights:
Mr. Shabi concluded his presentation by acknowledging and thanking God and the many faithful members and reminding the Council that budget preparation would be a primary focus over the next few months, with the goal of presenting a proposed budget for the next fiscal year at the February meetings.
Committee Chairman Reports: [video done]
Education Committee—Aaron Dean
The Education Committee has not been assigned any new duties. Education programs are still progressing. Some of the programs mentioned were the Pastoral Development Program, ABC with 24 students, leadership training in the country of Africa later this month, and youth camps. Education for our scattered brethren is a monumental task. We do all we can with the limited resources we have and ask God and Jesus Christ to make up the difference. It takes faith.
Roles and Rules Committee—Rainer Salomaa
The Roles and Rules Committee has a few tasks before it since the August meetings:
Ethics Committee—Tony Wasilkoff
Mr. Wasilkoff gave the update for Mario Seiglie because he was teaching an ABC class. The scope of the committee’s work, as directed by the Council, extends to all matters of ethics and ethical conduct within the church organization, including the alleged violation of standards described in official documentation. There are seven specific tasks of responsibility. There is nothing remanded to the committee at this time.
Doctrine Committee—John Elliott
Since the August meetings the Doctrine Committee (DC) and its subcommittees have been reviewing submitted papers on the following topics:
Work has been continuous on each of those projects, and included a teleconference attended by chairman Don Ward. The DC is in the process of finalizing work on three of these projects: Sardis, tattoos and the title “mister”.
Strategic Planning and Finance Committee—Bob Dick
This is a busy time of year for the Strategic Planning and Finance Committee (SPFC). They were given the survey results in August, which gives needed insight to assist in future planning.
There are ideal times for strategic planning: when office morale is high, when there is institutional stability, when times are peaceful, and when finances are in good shape. Since all of these apply, now is a time for extensive strategic planning.
The first strategic plan was established under its current model in 2008-2009. Shortly thereafter we lost the majority of those trained in the new approach. This was followed by difficult times for the Church, and as a result the strategic planning process stalled. We would now like to continue forward with objectives-based planning.
The chairman called for a three-stage process with the first measurable objectives being added to the Strategic Plan for GCE approval in May. Additional development of measurable objectives would happen during the next year. Finally, a study of all of our objectives would take place in order to reach agreement on which goals and objectives can only measure activities or outputs, and not predict specific outcomes.
Media and Communications Committee—Scott Ashley
The biggest media issue the Council is dealing with is the new media center building. Scott Ashley said the entire Council has been involved in those discussions.
Nothing is currently remanded to the Media and Communications Committee (MCC). One responsibility for the MCC is to review the media operation report before it is given. Due to scheduling difficulties there was no regular video conference for this before these Council meetings, but a preview of the report was sent out to committee members to review.
“Scopes and Responsibilities—Executive Committee”—Rainer Salomaa [video done]
The only committee that serves for the Council that does not have a defined scope and responsibility is the Executive Committee (EC). Gerald Seelig, as secretary to the Council, drafted the initial document to present to the Council for its approval.
The proposed Executive Committee Scope and Responsibilities document was distributed and discussed. Minor word edits were suggested, and a quorum of the Council unanimously approved it.
External Audit Report—Rick Shabi, Kerry Roe (auditor) [video done]
Following lunch chairman Ward introduced Kerry Roe, who is a partner with Clark Schaefer Hackett, the independent accounting firm the Church engages to perform the annual audit. Mr. Roe made a presentation to the Council on financial highlights from the recent audit. He commented that, based on the audit and their review of systems and internal controls, the Council can rely on the accuracy of monthly financial reports generated internally, and that their audit again resulted in an “unqualified opinion” on the financial statements. He also commented on the Church’s favorable cash balances and how assets have grown for the fifth straight year, with little change in liabilities, except for new mortgages on purchased church buildings. He answered the few questions that were asked by the Council.
Review of Strategic Plan—Bob Dick [video done]
Bob Dick, as the chair of the Strategic Planning and Finance Committee, led the discussion in reviewing the current Strategic Plan. He began by going over key terms and discussing the creation of S.M.A.R.T. goals, which are Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Timely.
The importance of having goals that can be measured was addressed. If you have a goal that can’t be measured then it is time to change your goal. You want your goals to be measurable. The challenge is to know what can be measured and what cannot. Sometimes it takes years to accurately assess a program. Mr. Dick encouraged the Council to get a copy of the United Way book on “Measuring Program Outcomes,” which is a good resource that can be found online.
The Council then began to discuss what the strategic issues of the UCG are right now. Some of the strategic areas discussed included youth education, engaging the young adults, quality of speaking, quality of the Beyond Today program and the quality of Feast sites.
Mark Mickelson commented that on the church website the people are already telling you what they like by the sermons they download. The problem can come from rewarding loyalty instead of quality of the message. The brethren listen and discuss the sermons they like.
Scott Ashley mentioned we have to acknowledge what we can control and what we can’t. We can control how many BT magazines we put out, but we can’t control the response.
Mario Seiglie commented that we can’t always look at outcomes. The Church is to preach the gospel, and it won’t always be popular, but it must be done. Noah was a preacher of righteousness for 100 years while building the ark with no response, but to God he was a success.
Dr. Ward mentioned the importance of discerning the times and looking at strategic planning from a certain worldview. We need to hone our messages to the critical times in which we are living with a sense of urgency.
Preview goals and plans for the future of Beyond Today video and the use of the new video recording studio—Victor Kubik [video done]
President Kubik began the presentation by mentioning the need for and the current conditions of our public proclamations. This is not a new conversation. The modern Church has always been one of public proclamation. We are always to be seeking God’s will and seek what God want us to do. Currently we are strong with our video, Internet and content online. We aren’t talking only about television, but video for cell phones, Roku and other streaming devices down the road. He then turned it over to Peter Eddington for further detail.
Mr. Eddington, as media operation manager, then went through explaining the current state of the media department’s video content, what is being done, and future programs that are being looked at. He explained that video content has the opportunity for first contact, and leads different types of people to God.
The media department is looking to create more video and stronger video. Currently we have the following programs:
Future programs could include the following:
About 25 percent of the media department’s time is spent supporting our ministry and congregations with sermon packs, camp videos and other services.
The critical next steps include:
Scott Ashley mentioned that when he had a photo studio in Big Sandy that he had a much bigger area to produce three magazines. Video content needs more space than what they currently have. They are doing a good job with what they have right now, but more is needed. Video and video channels are the future and need to be planned for.
Mario Seiglie asked how much more production content will increase with a new studio. Mr. Eddington said quite a bit more content could be produced. Mr. Seiglie also asked how much room this would free up in the home office. Mr. Eddington said four rooms would be freed up.
Mr. Kubik ended the presentation by mentioning the media department has done very well with what they have done and the administration wants to be as transparent as possible.
The Council took a brief break at 4:30 and then went into scheduled executive session for the remainder of the day to have a discussion of the video studio plans.
The Council adjourned at 6:22 p.m.
[video done] = indicates the session was recorded and if posted can be found at: http://coe.ucg.org/videos
Tuesday, December 5, 2017
Chairman Don Ward called the morning session to order at 9:00 a.m. Eastern, and the meeting was opened with prayer. Eleven Council of Elders (Council) members were present. Scott Ashley missed the first 90 minutes, and Mario Seiglie missed the second 90 minutes because they were teaching ABC classes.
The Council began in scheduled executive session to conduct interviews for secretary candidates.
The Council came into open session at 11:36 a.m.
Discussion of International Representative’s Term—Rainer Salomaa
On a few occasions a U.S. representative has been balloted onto the Council and then their primary work has changed to international areas or vice versa. This most recently has occurred with John Elliott. Mr. Elliott now has his primary responsibility in Canada and East Africa even though he lives in the U.S. The question has been asked on how to put wording into our bylaws to describe the policy for when this happens.
The Council proposed an edit to the current 8.4.1 bylaw to clarify the process. The Council discussed it and needed more clarity on how this should go forward. Dr. Ward remanded it to the Roles and Rules Committee to clarify and bring it back later in the week to the Council.
Video Recording Studio
After lunch the Council went into scheduled executive session to continue their discussion of the video studio plans, budget and contractor. They came into open session at 3:48 p.m. to present three resolutions and ballot on them:
After further discussion, Mario Seiglie moves, Rex Sexton seconds and the Council of Elders, by a ballot of ten (10) for and two (2) against (Dan Dowd and Mark Mickelson), adopts the following:
Whereas, at a teleconference of the Council of Elders on November 8, 2017, the Council advised the president and operation manager of Media and Communications Services that, before the approval of any budget, increase in funding solicitation or construction of a (proposed) Video Recording Studio it had to approve the plans and specifications for the same, and
Whereas, complete drawings, plans and specifications (“plans”) for said Video Recording Studio have been developed by an architect hired for that purpose (KBA Architects) for a building with a 5,000 square foot footprint, which plans have already been found to be in accord with local building codes and zoning requirements, and
Whereas, the Council has reviewed those basic drawings (with the detailed construction plans also having been made available for their inspection) and has approved the same for the proposed Video Recording Studio,
Now therefore, it is hereby resolved that, the Council of Elders approves the Video Recording Studio drawings attached hereto and agrees that the architectural, site, mechanical, electrical and plumbing construction plans (as already permitted by the applicable city and county planning boards) may be used as the basis for the pricing, fundraising and construction bids previously solicited for the Video Recording Studio.
After further discussion, Scott Ashley moves, Mario Seiglie seconds and the Council of Elders, by a ballot of nine (9) for and three (3) against (Robert Dick, Mark Mickelson and Dan Dowd), adopts the following:
Whereas, on December 7, 2016, the Council approved establishing a restricted fund for the purpose of securing donations to expand the home office building by adding a Video Recording Studio to further develop electronic media efforts of the Church, and
Whereas, the Video Recording Studio drawings and construction plans have now been approved and the probable construction costs (based on bids from several contractors using those plans as their basis for the same) have been calculated, and
Whereas, said construction and studio outfitting costs are beyond the original estimated amount of $550,000 to $600,000,
Now therefore, it is hereby resolved that, the Council of Elders approves the increase in funding for projected costs for construction of the Video Recording Studio to an estimated total of $800,000, said funds to come from restricted donations and, if needed, reserves.
After further discussion, Mario Seiglie moves, John Elliott seconds and the Council of Elders, by a ballot of eight (8) for and four (4) against (Tony Wasilkoff, Mark Mickelson, Dan Dowd and Bob Dick), adopts the following:
Whereas, the Council of Elders has approved the drawings for a Video Recording Studio along with the architectural, site, mechanical, electrical and plumbing plans (“construction plans”), and
Whereas, bids have been solicited and received for the Video Recording Studio, a projected cost for construction can be determined, and
Now therefore, it is hereby resolved that, the president is authorized to select a contractor to build said Video Recording Studio in accordance with the plans approved by the Council at a cost not to exceed $750,000 (plus up to ten percent (10%) of the contracted amount for unplanned cost overage, if needed) and to negotiate and sign under such terms and conditions, as he shall deem proper, a construction contract, after review and consultation with the Church’s legal counsel.
Follow-up Discussion of Modifications to the “Elder Ordination Procedure” That Was Approved on Jan. 3, 2012—Victor Kubik
Mr. Kubik introduced Chris Rowland to present revisions to the Elder Ordination Procedure. It was handed out to the Council for review. The updated procedure would establish a review panel for each ministerial candidate, consisting of an appointed Council member, the operation manager for Ministerial and Member Services (MMS), the regional pastor and a member of the Ministerial Education Team (MET). The MET consists of Victor Kubik, Darris McNeely, Steve Myers and Chris Rowland.
Dr. Ward said he was not in favor of this process. He would prefer the current process instead of the new proposal.
Rex Sexton said that the same three names from MET keep coming up, and they don’t need to be overworked.
Mr. Kubik explained that they want a broader group as a panel to evaluate a ministerial candidate’s educational needs during the ordination approval process.
Mark Mickelson felt that this is going in the wrong direction. There is a constant centralization instead of pastoral ownership. He didn’t agree with this proposal.
Mr. Kubik explained that there has been concern with the depth of Bible knowledge of the newly ordained and that many new elders feel unprepared and would like more education before taking on that role. Since our last split we replenished a third of the elders. There needs to be a better process for ordinations. He thought the Council had consensus for proposing new procedures.
Dan Dowd said this wasn’t a change of mind. Quality was desired, and a process of vetting is needed. Mr. Dowd expected the criteria of material to be for the pastor to go through instead of it being a home office administrative matter.
Dr. Ward commented that he would trust the pastor in this process more than the proposed process.
Scott Ashley agreed that it should go back to the pastors, however, he wasn’t hearing a solution to men not knowing our doctrines or being educated in our doctrines. We have no Ambassador College anymore for training. So a solution is needed.
The majority of the Council was not in favor of this proposed process. There was agreement that an updated procedure was needed, but that the pastors should have the oversight instead of the home office. Many of the components for the education of ministerial candidates were very useful and were good ways to teach the pastors what is expected and help them in the process.
Dr. Ward asked what the end goal is in this presentation.
Mr. Rowland asked for direction and input for addressing the problems that Mr. Ashley brought up.
Jorge de Campos agreed that the standard must be raised. Maybe some prerequisites could be established.
Dr. Ward suggested that the candidate should complete the Labor in the Word curriculum.
Aaron Dean mentioned that non-doctrinal ideas could be included on the list. Maybe a checklist could be provided to pastors for training.
Chairman Ward agreed that some of these ideas for a checklist could already be implemented with the local pastors. We want to improve the vetting process and involve pastors in this more. He said that there should be continued work on a checklist to bring back to the Council in the February meetings. The Council members were asked to send Mr. Rowland any of their ideas.
As the Council was wrapping up for the day, Mr. Kubik invited the Council to visit the Noah’s Ark replica south of Cincinnati on Wednesday afternoon.
The Council adjourned at 5:25 p.m.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017
Chairman Don Ward called the morning session to order at 9:00 a.m. Eastern, and the meeting was opened with prayer. Eleven Council of Elders (Council) members were present. Scott Ashley missed the first 90 minutes, and Mario Seiglie missed the second 90 minutes because they were teaching ABC classes.
Doctrine Committee—John Elliott [video done]
One fundamental belief amendment is to be presented to the Council as part of the due process. The fundamental belief amendment has gone through the process of coming before the Fundamental Beliefs Advisory Committee (FBAC) and also to the chairman of the Doctrine Committee (DC), John Elliott, and now before the Council. The question was asked if this presentation was to be in open or closed session.
Gerald Seelig recommended it stay in open because the GCE needs to be aware of the deliberations of the Council. It was agreed to stay in open.
The proposal was passed out and read. It involved the Fundamental Belief in Constitution 2.2.1. The proposal suggests that Jesus Christ ceased to exist for three days while in the grave. The Fundamental Belief Advisory Committee comprising Jim Cowell, Robert Gardenhire, Ken Graham, Larry Walker and Randy D’Alessandro (chairman) did not agree with this proposal.
The FBAC’s letter was read, as well as the DC’s letter to the FBAC stating the disagreement of Scripture with the proposed change. The author still wants his proposed amendment to proceed. So now it is before the Council.
The Council was asked if anyone supported this amendment to our Fundamental Beliefs. There was no support. A Council statement of concern will accompany the proposal when it is sent to the GCE to assess if there is a one-third support from the GCE.
The DC also has finished the review and revision of a PCD letter on tattoos that was sent to the DC for consideration. Historically the Church has taken the position that tattoos are forbidden by Scripture. The position has been in our documents through the years. In recent times, there have been papers that have caused confusion regarding the Church’s teaching on tattoos. In 2009 someone adjusted the previous PCD letter, which prompted a request in 2014 for the DC to review it in the course of its work. It has gone through the Doctrinal Advisory Committee and processed through the DC. It is now ready to be brought before the Council.
Dan Dowd has been the DC’s lead on this project, so he was introduced to present it and lead the discussion.
The historical PCD letter for UCG was passed out along with the 2009 changed letter. The PCD letter from 2009 tried to explain tattoos as a modern grooming issue, while Scripture speaks otherwise.
The recommendation from the DC was to replace it with their proposed new PCD letter. Its content is not new doctrine but rather the teaching the Church has previously held. Quotes from various UCG literature (Vertical Thought and an online teen Bible study) were cited to show the Church’s long-held belief on tattoos.
Aaron Dean was on the Council when the revised letter was published in 2009, but was unaware of it. He asked where the changed PCD letter came from. It was clearly a change of doctrine.
Rex Sexton asked what checks and balances are in place for the doctrinal content of PCD letters going out. The Council needs to do a quick review of these PCD letters and make sure they are all in line with Church doctrine.
Peter Eddington said the PCD letters are taken care of under the auspices of Ministerial Services. He stated that he wasn’t aware of this change. Chris Rowland said the date on the changed PCD letter was 2009, so it was under a previous administration.
Gerald Seelig said it would be good for the Council to lend its full support so it can’t be changed again without another resolution from the Council.
After further discussion, Rex Sexton moves, Aaron Dean seconds and the Council of Elders unanimously adopts the following:
Whereas, the Council desires to update the Personal Correspondence Department letter with regard to tattoos,
Now therefore, it is resolved that, the Personal Correspondence Department updated letter with regard to tattoos, a copy of which is attached and made a part of this resolution, is accepted and is to be distributed to all the ministry and printed in the United News.
2017 GCE Exit Survey—Charles Melear [video done]
The 2017 GCE exit survey was discussed to see if there were any changes or improvements for next year. Most comments on the survey were in regard to the roundtable discussion and the Q&A session.
Suggestions were discussed on how to improve the Q&A and other portions of the GCE weekend. It was also discussed to have the international presentations again. Further discussions will be held in the February meetings.
Policy on Elders Not Accepting Gifts or Bequests From Members—Vic Kubik [video done]
Mr. Kubik gave a presentation to the Council on the importance of having a policy regarding elders not accepting gifts or bequests from members or involvement in member’s estates. He gave the Council a proposal to look at. He discussed the importance of not being greedy for money or not being accused of it. This presentation was for the Council to be aware of at this time.
2018 GCE Theme Discussion—Charles Melear [video done]
Mr. Melear, as chair of the GCE planning taskforce, presented proposals for the theme of the GCE in May 2018. Potential themes were presented. The themes were discussed, and the majority of the Council approved the theme: “Iron That Sharpens Iron.”
Lunch was at 11:30, and then the remainder of the afternoon most of the Council went with Mr. Kubik to the Noah’s Ark replica south of Cincinnati.
The Council adjourned at 11:28 a.m.
Thursday, December 7, 2017
Chairman Don Ward called the morning session to order at 9:02 a.m. Eastern, and the meeting was opened with prayer. Eleven Council of Elders (Council) members were present. Scott Ashley missed the first 90 minutes.
Strategic Planning and Finance Committee (SPFC)—Bob Dick [video done]
Bob Dick led the discussion finishing up the ideas for the strategic planning. The intent today was to identify those objectives that were not measureable and in need of modification or replacement. The president will lead staff in developing measurable objectives for the 2018/2019 Strategic Plan with assistance when requested from the SPFC. The Council then discussed more ideas on identifying those areas of improvement.
Upcoming Council Meetings [video done]
Feb. 26—March 1, 2018, in Big Sandy, Texas.
Chairman Ward remanded to the Strategic Planning and Finance Committee (SPFC) the charge of reviewing the entire retirement process and to report to the Council at the May meeting. The Council agreed.
Proposed Amendment to Bylaw 8.4.1—Rainer Salomaa [video done]
The statement of justification for the proposed amendment to Bylaw 8.4.1 was discussed with some edits.
The Council then proposed the amendment and statement of justification to Bylaw 8.4.1. It was unanimously approved.
Proposed Amendment to the Rules of Association: Addition of Chapter 5—Asset Protection—Rainer Salomaa [video done]
This proposed amendment was suggested by Church legal counsel Larry Darden. He presented it to the Council.
Rex Sexton asked if all the national councils approved this proposal. Gerald Seelig said they all approved it.
Ten Council members approved for it to go before the GCE in May.
The Council then went into scheduled executive session for legal review with Larry Darden at 10:46 a.m.
The Council came into open session at 11:48 a.m.
The Council approved the statement of concern that went with the Fundamental of Beliefs Amendment 2.1.1 that was discussed on Wednesday. The Council unanimously approved the statement of concern that will go out to the GCE.
Jorge de Campos extended the Council’s gratitude to the Governing Documents Review Team headed by Bill Eddington for all the work they did in this project to review our governing documents over the last few years, and which is now completed with this addition to the Rules of Association. Bill Eddington’s lead was particularly noted and appreciated.
The Council adjourned at 11:57 a.m.
-end-
Council Reporter
Shawn Cortelyou
© 2017 United Church of God, an International Association